Who it is for
Enterprises with a significant SQL Server footprint — on-prem, virtualized, or in Azure — facing a true-up, a renewal, or an audit letter, and suspecting they are paying more than they should.
Productized engagement
Core vs. CAL, Software Assurance, virtualization and container rules, Azure Hybrid Benefit — a specialist review of your actual deployment inventory finds the savings. And if the math says otherwise, it makes the case to escape to PostgreSQL instead of renewing.
The engagement
Enterprises with a significant SQL Server footprint — on-prem, virtualized, or in Azure — facing a true-up, a renewal, or an audit letter, and suspecting they are paying more than they should.
SQL Server licensing rules reward the people who read them: core vs. CAL modeling, Software Assurance benefits left on the table, virtualization and HA licensing as the most common overspend area. Without a specialist inventory, you renew what you bought years ago — at full price.
One to two weeks, remote. Deployment inventory in the first days; analysis and the savings roadmap after. Explicitly not included: legal counsel on licensing disputes (this is technical analysis, not legal advice), license procurement or reselling, or executing a migration.
The review's output is either optimize the licenses or escape them: the savings number leads into a Database Migration Assessment when the math says migrate to PostgreSQL instead of renewing, or into FinOps work when it says stay.
Our free SQL Server→PostgreSQL migration pack covers the escape route in full. This engagement is the next level: we inventory your actual estate and show you, in numbers, whether to optimize or migrate.
Start here
Thirty minutes with an architect to scope the review. The savings number usually pays for the conversation by itself.